Potential of The Citizen Science Project (CSP) to Support Biodiversity Learning in Indonesia

  • Utari Akhir Gusti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Topik Hidayat Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Siti Sriyati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Gheri Febri Ananda Universitas Gajah Mada
Keywords: Citizen Science Project, Biodiversity Learning, Indonesia, Conservation

Abstract

Conservation of biodiversity in Indonesia is very important. This condition is supported by the high diversity owned but very minimal conservation efforts. Collaborative action between local communities and scientists in learning is needed to support conservation through education. Therefore, it is important to analyze the potential of citizen science projects in biodiversity lessons. This study aims to investigate the potential of citizen science projects and the condition of biodiversity learning in schools. This research is classified as descriptive qualitative. The sampling technique used random sampling with data collection using interviews, questionnaire distribution, and literature study. The results obtained show that citizen science projects have great potential in supporting biodiversity learning in Indonesia with local knowledge owned by indigenous peoples. The results are reinforced by data from students and teachers who agree to support citizen science project innovations in conscious, meaningful, and fun learning. This research reveals learning innovations that become alternatives in learning biodiversity in the success of learning outcomes in the form of conservation through education.

References

Adinugraha, F., & Ratnapuri, A. (2020). Keanekaragaman Hayati: Pembelajaran Biologi dengan Pendekatan Kearifan Lokal dan Budaya untuk SMA/MA.
Aripin, I., Hidayat, T., Rustaman, N., & Riandi, R. (2021). Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Biologi Konservasi Berbasis Citizen Science Project. Pedagogi Hayati, 5(1), 1–9.
Bonney, R., Cooper, C., & Ballard, H. (2016). The Theory and Practice of Citizen Science: Launching a New Journal. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.65
Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., & Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 2(12), 11.
Cornwell, M. L., & Campbell, L. M. (2012). Co-producing conservation and knowledge: Citizen-based sea turtle monitoring in North Carolina, USA. Social Studies of Science, 42(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711430440
Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Ballard, H. L., & Sturtevant, V. E. (2008). Adaptive Management and Social Learning in Collaborative and Community-Based Monitoring: a Study of Five Community-Based Forestry Organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society, 13(2), art4. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02400-130204
Greving, H., Bruckermann, T., Schumann, A., Straka, T. M., Lewanzik, D., Voigt-Heucke, S. L., Marggraf, L., Lorenz, J., Brandt, M., Voigt, C. C., Harms, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2022). Improving attitudes and knowledge in a citizen science project about urban bat ecology. Ecology and Society, 27(2), art24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13272-270224
Gurevitch, J., Scheiner, S. M., & Fox, G. A. (2020). Global Biodiversity Patterns, Loss, and Conservation. In The Ecology of Plants. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hesc/9781605358291.003.0023
Gusti, U. A., Hidayat, T., Hamidah, N., & Sriyati, S. (2023). Tren Penelitian Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Citizen Science Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Abad 21. Edusains, 15(2), 112–123.
Haklay, M. (2012). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice, 105–122.
Jordan, R. C., Ballard, H. L., & Phillips, T. B. (2012). Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen-science learning outcomes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 307–309. https://doi.org/10.1890/110280
Krasny, M. E., & Bonney, R. (2005). Environmental education through citizen science and participatory action research. Cambrige University Press.
Lewandowski, E. J., & Oberhauser, K. S. (2017). Butterfly citizen scientists in the United States increase their engagement in conservation. Biological Conservation, 208, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.029
McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S. C., Evans, D. M., French, R. A., Parrish, J. K., Phillips, T. B., Ryan, S. F., Shanley, L. A., Shirk, J. L., Stepenuck, K. F., Weltzin, J. F., Wiggins, A., Boyle, O. D., Briggs, R. D., Chapin, S. F., … Soukup, M. A. (2017). Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015
Setiawan, A. (2022). Keanekaragaman hayati Indonesia: Masalah dan upaya konservasinya. Indonesian Journal of Conservation, 11(1), 13–21.
Somerwill, L., & Wehn, U. (2022). How to measure the impact of citizen science on environmental attitudes, behaviour and knowledge? A review of state-of-the-art approaches. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1), 1–29.
Sugiarti, T. (2023). Menyelidiki Dampak Teknologi Kelas Terhadap Kemajuan Siswa Pada Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Berbasis Kolaborasi (Analisis Prosedur, Implementasi Dan Penulisan Laporan). TEACHING: Jurnal Inovasi Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51878/teaching.v3i2.2360
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
Surbakti, R. P. (n.d.). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Daring Siswa Pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati DI SMAN 1 Air Batu TP 2020/2021 (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED). 2021.
Trautmann, N. M., Shirk, J. L., Fee, J., & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Who Poses the Question? In Citizen Science (pp. 179–190). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801449116.003.0013
Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2005). Developing materials to promote inquiry: Lessons learned. Science Education, 89(6), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20081
Published
2025-12-22
Abstract viewed = 110 times