Improving Students Critical Thinking through STEAM-PjBL Learning
Abstract
The industrial revolution 4.0 era affected people’s lives, as well as the education system and student learning. The world of education must be able to create and design learning life skills for the 21st century, which one of it is critical thinking skills. Efforts are made by applying the STEAM approach and using the PjBL model. The research was carried out at SMP Muhammadiyah 6 Wuluhan Jember, control class VII B and experiment class VII A. Material KD. 3.8 Analyzing the occurence of environmental pollution and its impact on the ecosystem. The result of the sig (2-tailed) value is 0.046, which indicates that hypotesis is accepted. To be conclude, the STEAM approach and PjBL model have a positive affect on students’ critical thinking skills.
References
Darmawan. (2018). Aceh Tribun News. Retrieved from Aceh Tribun News: https://aceh.tribunnews.com/2018/11/27/ menjadi-guru-era-pendidikan-40?page=2
Daryanto, K. S. (2017). Pembelajaran abad 21. Yogjakarta: Gaya Media.
Devi, K. P. (2018). STEM: Materi IHT Instruktur Pembelajaran Berbasis STEM. Kerjasama SEAMEO QITEP in Science dengan PPPPTK BOE .
Kamdi, W. (2008). Project Based Learning: Pendekatan Pembelajaran Inovatif, Makalah Pelatihan Penyusunan Bahan Ajar Guru SMP dan SMA Kota Tarakan. Malang: Universitas Malang.
Kebudayaan, K. P. (2013). Materi Pelatihan Guru: Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 SMA/MA, SMA/MAK Matematika. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.
Kunandar. (2007). Guru Profesional: Implementasi KTSP dan Persiapan Menghadapi Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo.
Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan. Surabaya: Kata Pena.
Kurniawan, D. (2011). Pembelajaran Terpadu. Bandung: Pustaka Cendikia Utama.
Latipun. (2004). Psikologi Eksperimen Edisi Kedua. Malang: UMM Press.
Musfiqon, H., & Nurdyansah. (2015). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik. Sidoarjo: Nizamia Learning Center.
Mulyasa. (2013). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
NAEA, N. A. (2016). (NAEA), National Art Education Association. Retrieved Juli 10, 2020, from https://arteducators-prod.s3amazonaws.com/documents.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally signifnificant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56(3), 407-424.
Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmadinanta, N. & Syaodih, E. (2012). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Kompetensi, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Sumitro, S. (2017). Ecobrick Solusi Cerdas dan Kreatif untuk Mengatasi Sampah Plastik. Productum: Jurnal Desain Produk, 3(1):26-34.
Taylor, P. C. (2016). Why Is a STEAM Curriculum Perspective Crucial to the 21st Century. Research Conference.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). Review Research on Project Based Learning. California: The Autodesk Faoundation.
Wibowo, T. (2019). Pembelajaran Matematika dan Risetnya di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Prosiding Sendika, 677-686.
Wijaya, A. D., Karmila, N., & Rizqi, A. M. (2015). Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematichs) pada Kurikulum Indonesia. Proseding Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya.
Wilson, B., & Hawkins, B. (2019). Art and Science in a Transdisciplinary Curriculum. CIRCE Magazine: STEAM Edition. Circe: The Centre for Imagination in Research, Culture & Education.
Yesildere, S., & E, B. T. (2006). The Efffect of Project Based Learning on Preservice Primary Mathematics Teachers Critical Thinking Dispositions. Int Online Science Math Ed, 6:1-11.
Zubaidah, S. (2019). STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) Pembelajaran untuk Memberdayakan Keterampilan Abad ke-21. Indramayu: FKIP Universitas Wiralodra Indramayu.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.