The Effect of Metacognitive based Learning Process on Environmental Pollution Subject towards Students’ Cognitive Competence

Aditya Rahman; Dwi Ratnasari; Silvy Destianingsih; Nurul Rahmah Kusumaputri

doi:10.24036/bioedu.v4i2.274

Aditya Rahman Universitas Sultan Agung Tirtayasa
Dwi Ratnasari Universitas Sultan Agung Tirtayasa
Silvy Destianingsih Universitas Sultan Agung Tirtayasa
Nurul Rahmah Kusumaputri Universitas Sultan Agung Tirtayasa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v4i2.274

Keywords: Cognitive, Environmental pollution, Metacognitive

Abstract

This research aims to determine the effect of metacognitive-based biology learning process towardsstudents’ cognitive competenceon environmental Pollution subject of class X SMA Plus Putra Bangsa Tangerang District. The method used in this research was quasi-experimental method. The population was all class X MIA with X MIA 1 of 17 people as the control sample and X MIA 2 of 18 people as the experimental sample. The instrument in this research were a test of students’ cognitive competence, a metacognitive competence questionnaire, and a compliance sheet. Based on the results of the research it can be concluded that there were differences in cognitive competence of students between the experimental class that was treated using a metacognitive basis and the control class that was treated using a conventional basis on environmental Pollution subject. The average score of cognitive competence in the control class was 53.09 which was included in the “sufficient cognitive” category. The result showedthe score of 68.61, which was included in the “goodcognitive” category. In the hypothesis test, it can be concluded that there was an impact of the use of Metacognitive-based learning process on students’ cognitive competence on environmental pollution subject.

References

Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). A Taxonomi for Learning, Teaching, and Assassing. New York: Addison Wesley Lonman Inc.

Brasilitas, Y. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajran Simas Eric Pada Jenis Kelamin Berbeda Terhadap Keterampilan Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Biologi di SMAN 6 Malang. Diakses dari http://jurnal-online.um.ac.id/data/artikel/938DF5FF9EA90F6D046CCB816B7E0CD.pdf. 07 Juli 2019, pk. 19.50.

Imel, S. (2002). Metacognition Beckground Brief from the QLRC News Summer 2004. Diakses dari http://www.cete.org/acve/does/tia.0017.pdf, 11 Juli 2019, pk 17.14.

Kramarski, B. & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enchancing Mathematical Reasoning in the Classroom: The Effects of Cooperative Learning and Metacognitive Training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310.

Maulana. (2008). Pendekatan Metakognitif Sebagai Alternatif Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGSD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(10):1-8.

Nasution, S. (1989). Kurikulum dan Pengajaran. Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Nopian, E., I. G. Meter, & I. W. Wiarta. (2013). Model pembelajaran TGT berbantuan media permainan ular tangga berpengaruh terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas IV SD gugus VIII Sukawati. Mimbar PGSD, 1(1):37-45.

Purwanto,N. (2012). Ilmu Teoritis dan Praktis. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rahman, A. & Ersinta, K. (2017). Implementation of fishbowl learning model on Students of communication students on concept of Environment pollution in class x sman 18 tangerang District. Biodidaktika, 12(2):91-101.

Rusman. (2011). Model-model Pembelajaran (Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sastrawati, E. (2011). Problem Based Learning, Strategi Metakognisi, dan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa. Jurnal Tekno-Pedagogi, 1(2):1-14.

Syah, M. (2009). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Syarifah, H. (2016). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran reading questioning and answering (RQA) dipadu think pair share (TPS) terhadap keterampilan metakognitif siswa laki-laki dan perempuan SMAN di Kota Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(5):801-805.

Tan, O. S., Richard, D. P., Hinson, S. L., & Sardo-Brown, D. (2004). Enchancing Thinking Through Problem-Based Learning Approach: International Perspectives. Singapore: Change Learning.

Tiro, M. A. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Statistik,Cet. II. Makassar: State University of Makassar Press.

Wartono. (2004). Materi Pelatihan Terintegrasi Sains. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Wilson, D., & Conyers, M. (2016). Teaching Students to Drive Their Brains. Virginia USA: ASCD.

Winasih, Y. (2009). Peningkatan respon siswa pada pembelajaran IPS melalui Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Program Sarjana Pendidikan IPS. Skripsi. Surakarta: FPMIPA Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta.